Continuum Economics
  • Search
  • About Us
  • Buy
  • Invite A Friend
  • My Basket
  • Articles
  • Calendar
  • Forecasts
  • Events
  • Data
  • Newsletters
  • My Alerts
  • Community
  • Directory
  • About Us
  • Buy
  • Invite A Friend
  • My Basket
  • Articles
    • All
    • Thematic
    • Tactical
    • Asia
    • EMEA
    • Americas
    • Newsletters
    • Freemium
    • Editor's Choice
    • Most Viewed
    • Most Shared
    • Most Liked
  • Calendar
    • Interactive
      • China
      • United States
      • Eurozone
      • United Kingdom
    • Month Ahead
    • Reviews
    • Previews
  • Forecasts
    • Forecasts
    • Key Views
  • Events
    • Media
    • Conference Calls
  • Data
    • Country Insights
    • Shadow Credit Ratings
    • Full CI Data Download
  • Newsletters
  • My Alerts
  • Community
    • FX
    • Fixed Income
    • Macro Strategy
    • Credit Markets
    • Equities
    • Commodities
    • Precious Metals
    • Renewables
  • Directory
  • My Account
  • Notifications Setup
  • Administration Panel
  • Account Details
  • Recent Devices
  • Distribution Lists
  • Shared Free Trials
  • Saved Articles
  • Shared Alerts
  • My Posts
Published: 2025-11-21T08:00:02.000Z

U.S. Asset Inflows After April’s Trump Tariffs

38

·       Net foreign portfolio inflows have not been hurt by Trump’s April tariff drama, with the AI and tech boom attracting new equity inflows.  Flows could become more volatile with a U.S. equity bear market or recession, but these are modest risk alternative scenarios rather than high risk.  The USD has declined in 2025 however due to the huge size of the current account deficit, though the USD decline should be modest in 2026.      

Figure 1:  Net Flows Into U.S. for 12mth to Sep 2025 (USD Blns)

Source: BEA/Continuum Economics. 

The combined August and September U.S. Treasury TICS data shows that private sector net inflows continue at a strong pace over the two months (though with the normal caveat with the TICS data and country of origin).  Equities net inflow from foreigners totaled USD207.7bln.  Over the last 12 months (Figure 1), private foreign buying on U.S. equities has been strong, with private sector U.S. Treasuries also seeing healthy net inflows.  The details from end March to end September suggests that foreign investors have not become more adverse to U.S. assets after Trump high stake April tariff drama.  U.S. equities are being helped by the AI/tech boom and elsewhere the solid long-term corporate earnings story.  U.S. Treasuries private sector inflows likely reflect the 2% real yield across the curve in the U.S. going into 2025 and anticipation of more Fed easing. Though official net outflows were USD74.9bln (mainly Treasuries and Agencies), this is small in comparison to the total private sector net inflows from foreigners. China sold USD50.7bln of U.S. Treasuries March to September 2025 as their reserve diversification continues.

U.S. investors have also not decided to dramatically increase purchases of foreign assets.  Though the 12mth total of foreign equities at USD139.7bln is up on the same period to Sep 2024, foreign bond buying slowed over the last 12 months to Sep 25 to USD180.9bln.

This occurred in the face of April Trump trade policy uncertainty and suggests that global investors are reluctant to slow or stop inflows unless major bad news is seen.  This is especially for the equity market, as foreign holdings of U.S. equities totaled USD21.3trn in Sep 2025 versus USD7.8trn for U.S. Treasuries. Major bad news could be a hard landing for the U.S., but we have recently decreased the probability of this scenario to 20% in the next 12 months.  Alternatively, a major adverse AI event or the Trump administration to significantly tight AI regulation. However, these are tail risk scenario. The Supreme Court rejecting Trump’s reciprocal tariffs is high probability (here), but likely moderate bad news as the Trump administration would likely use other tariff options and also try to codify existing agreed framework deals quickly. 

While we do see a correction in U.S. equities and a flat performance through end 2026 (here), but this is unlikely to be a big hit to new foreign investor inflows.  If Trump dramatically undermines Fed credibility and raises long-term inflation expectations with changes to the Fed, then this could slow U.S. Treasury net inflows.  However, Trump has been distracted in recent months and also his approval rating has declined due to a sense among voters that the administration is not dealing with the cost of living crisis. We will get a new Fed chair and Washington based governor in 2026, but this is unlikely to dramatically change policy decision or key targets like core PCE at 2%.      

The healthy inflows have not resulted in a higher USD in 2025 however.  The U.S. current account deficit is likely to be around USD1200bln in 2025, while net foreign and U.S. security flows have been USD1190bln in the 12mth to September 2025 according to the TICS data.  Anecdotal reports have also suggested that foreign investors in U.S. securities have also been more active in hedging U.S. bond and equity risk in 2025 than 2024, which has been a factor weakening the USD.  The October IMF GSFR (Figure 2) noted that Optimal Volatility Minimizing FX Hedge Ratio had increased. 

Figure 2: Optimal Volatility Minimizing FX Hedge Ratio (%)

 

Source: IMF GFSR October 2025

Foreign investors are likely to have focused on the high value of the USD more, after April Trump related drama and this could have prompted more FX hedging.  For 2026, the USD still remains overvalued on a real effective exchange rate basis (Figure 3).  We look for a modest USD decline against most DM currencies in 2026, as we do not currently see a major adverse event hitting the U.S.   Even so, we still see USDJPY going to 140 by end 2026 (here).  If a bear market were to occur in U.S. equities it could mean more of a USD decline than our baseline, both as U.S. equities inflows from foreigners would slow and the market would pencil in sub 3% Fed Funds rate.  

Figure 3: USD Real Effective Exchange Rate (%)

Source: Datastream/Continuum Economics


4Cast Ltd. and all of its affiliates (Continuum Economics) do not conduct “investment research” as defined in the FCA Conduct of Business Sourcebook (COBS) section 12 nor do they provide “advice about securities” as defined in the Regulation of Investment Advisors by the U.S. SEC. Continuum Economics is not regulated by the SEC or by the FCA or by any other regulatory body. This research report has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and is not subject to any prohibition on dealing ahead of the dissemination of investment research. Nonetheless, Continuum Economics has an internal policy that prohibits “front-running” and that is designed to minimize the risk of receiving or misusing confidential or potentially material non-public information. The views and conclusions expressed here may be changed without notice. Continuum Economics, its partners and employees make no representation about the completeness or accuracy of the data, calculations, information or opinions contained in this report. This report may not be copied, redistributed or reproduced in part or whole without Continuum Economics’s express permission. Information contained in this report or relied upon in its construction may previously have been disclosed under a consulting agreement with one or more clients. The prices of securities referred to in the report may rise or fall and past performance and forecasts should not be treated as a reliable indicator of future performance or results. This report is not directed to you if Continuum Economics is barred from doing so in your jurisdiction. Nor is it an offer or solicitation to buy or sell securities or to enter into any investment transaction or use any investment service.
Analyst Declaration
I,Mike Gallagher, the Director of Research declare that the views expressed herein are mine and are clear, fair and not misleading at the time of publication. They have not been influenced by any relationship, either a personal relationship of mine or a relationship of the firm, to any entity described or referred to herein nor to any client of Continuum Economics nor has any inducement been received in relation to those views. I further declare that in the preparation and publication of this report I have at all times followed all relevant Continuum Economics compliance protocols including those reasonably seeking to prevent the receipt or misuse of material non-public information.
Topics
DM Central Banks
EM Central Banks
EM Country Research
DM Country Research
Emerging Asia
Scenario Analysis
Macro Strategy
Editor's Choice
Eurozone
Free Thematic
Latin America
AMERICAS
EMEA
ASIA
UNITED STATES
UNITED KINGDOM
GERMANY
CHINA
INDIA
RUSSIAN FEDERATION
JAPAN
SOUTH AFRICA
CANADA
BRAZIL
MEXICO

GENERAL

  • Home
  • About Us
  • Our Team
  • Careers

LEGAL

  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Compliance
  • GDPR

GET IN TOUCH

  • Contact Us
Continuum Economics
The Technical Analyst Awards Winner 2021
The Technical Analyst Awards Finalist 2020
image