Published: 2025-09-12T06:52:10.000Z

UK GDP Review: Conflicting Signs

304

Although we are pointed to a flat m/m GDP outcome for the July data, thereby matching the official outcome, the actual outcome was a small m/m fall (before rounding).  The three-month rate slowed a notch to 0.2% but we think this overstates what is very feeble momentum, which may actually be nearer zero.  Even so, at this juncture, the strong June outcome of 0.4% has created a solid backdrop for the current quarter GDP to support the BoE’s 0.3% Q3 forecast – even successive 0.1% m/m declines would still leave the quarter up 0.1% in q/q terms, that is without what may still be likely revisions but his remains our projection.

Figure 1: GDP Growing Solidly – Alternative Scenarios?

Source: ONS, CE

To what extent better weather in July GDP.  The result was that the economy grew by 0.4% q/q in Q2 also higher than expected.  But gauging the economy is all the more difficult given both conflicting signal and the extent to which the public sector has supported growth of late (Figure 2).   The question is whether this latter factor will go in to reverse.  As for conflicting signal this is best highlighted by recent headline regarding service sector surveys.  Indeed, according to the CBO, activity across the services sector continues to weaken while August's PMI sees 'Steepest upturn in service sector output since April 2024'.

Figure 2: GDP Supported by Public Sector – But Can That Last?

Source: ONS, CE

4Cast Ltd. and all of its affiliates (Continuum Economics) do not conduct “investment research” as defined in the FCA Conduct of Business Sourcebook (COBS) section 12 nor do they provide “advice about securities” as defined in the Regulation of Investment Advisors by the U.S. SEC. Continuum Economics is not regulated by the SEC or by the FCA or by any other regulatory body. This research report has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and is not subject to any prohibition on dealing ahead of the dissemination of investment research. Nonetheless, Continuum Economics has an internal policy that prohibits “front-running” and that is designed to minimize the risk of receiving or misusing confidential or potentially material non-public information. The views and conclusions expressed here may be changed without notice. Continuum Economics, its partners and employees make no representation about the completeness or accuracy of the data, calculations, information or opinions contained in this report. This report may not be copied, redistributed or reproduced in part or whole without Continuum Economics’s express permission. Information contained in this report or relied upon in its construction may previously have been disclosed under a consulting agreement with one or more clients. The prices of securities referred to in the report may rise or fall and past performance and forecasts should not be treated as a reliable indicator of future performance or results. This report is not directed to you if Continuum Economics is barred from doing so in your jurisdiction. Nor is it an offer or solicitation to buy or sell securities or to enter into any investment transaction or use any investment service.
Analyst Declaration
I,Andrew Wroblewski, the Senior Economist Western Europe declare that the views expressed herein are mine and are clear, fair and not misleading at the time of publication. They have not been influenced by any relationship, either a personal relationship of mine or a relationship of the firm, to any entity described or referred to herein nor to any client of Continuum Economics nor has any inducement been received in relation to those views. I further declare that in the preparation and publication of this report I have at all times followed all relevant Continuum Economics compliance protocols including those reasonably seeking to prevent the receipt or misuse of material non-public information.