North America April 02, 2021 / 06:07 am UTC

Biden Investment and Benefits Proposals

By Mike Gallagher, David Sloan

Bottom line: The Biden administration’s $2.25trn infrastructure plan is expected to be followed by a $1trn 10-year benefits package in April. Congress will likely water down the proposed tax increases and we see eventual passage requiring $1.5-2trn of extra budget deficit financing in the next 10 years. We do not see this threatening U.S. debt sustainability, as the Fed will only eventually run down part of the QE Treasuries holdings acquired since March 2020. 

Figure 1: U.S. Government Debt Projections (% of GDP) 

Source: Continuum Economics

Infrastructure then Benefits Package 

President Biden’s $2.25trn infrastructure spending covers 10 years (see White House factsheet), but the bulk is expected to occur in the first eight years between 2022 and 2029. Four main areas of corporate tax increases are identified, and estimates are that they would raise around $1.4trn over the same period — the White House assumes that the tax increases will be permanent, which in theory would make the proposal more budget-neutral over a 15-year period. 

The problem is that the Democrats’ thin House and Senate majority means that net tax raised over the next 10 years will likely be more moderate. Senator Joe Manchin favors a 25% corporation tax, and if this were adopted then the tax hike would be $300bn lower over the period. House members and some Senators also want to see the state and local income tax deduction caps changed, which would reduce net revenue. Additionally, though Republicans oppose the corporate tax increases, the Democrats in Congress and the White House are expected to try to work on the $620bn transportation component, as it includes elements that cannot pass by Democratic-only budget reconciliation. The bills are expected in Congress in July-August for passage in September.

Part 2 in April will see a benefits package of approximately $1trn over 10 years for childcare, healthcare and education. As with the infrastructure package, the Biden administration may propose to eventually raise enough taxes over, say, 15 years to pay for these measures. However, over 10 years the revenue increase will be less and some proposals may not be able to pass through Congress, e.g. removing tax deductions for small businesses or the minimum 28% tax on the wealthy. Capital gains tax reform and restoring the top 39.6% tax rate over $400k are more likely to progress, but they only raise $500bn over 10 years. 

From an economic perspective, the infrastructure and benefits that eventually pass through Congress will likely total $3trn over 10 years, but the 10-year revenue increase will likely be in the $1-1.5trn range. The difference would be covered by $1.5-2trn of extra budget deficit financing. Figure 1 shows our estimate of $2trn of extra budget financing, plus the $1.9trn Biden COVID relief package and CBO baseline. This would leave the debt held by the public at 113% of GDP by 2031. Provided that the Fed eventually only reduce U.S. Treasury holdings by $1.5trn between 2027 and 2031, the U.S. government debt ex financial asset and Fed holdings would still be under control at 90% of GDP at the end of the period. This sustainable government debt trend means that the U.S. does not need an extra yield premium and that bear flattening should eventually be seen when the Fed raise the Fed Funds rate from 2023. 

4Cast Ltd. and all of its affiliates (Continuum Economics) do not conduct “investment research” as defined in the FCA Conduct of Business Sourcebook (COBS) section 12 nor do they provide “advice about securities” as defined in the Regulation of Investment Advisors by the U.S. SEC. Continuum Economics is not regulated by the SEC or by the FCA or by any other regulatory body. This research report has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and is not subject to any prohibition on dealing ahead of the dissemination of investment research. Nonetheless, Continuum Economics has an internal policy that prohibits “front-running” and that is designed to minimize the risk of receiving or misusing confidential or potentially material non-public information. The views and conclusions expressed here may be changed without notice. Continuum Economics, its partners and employees make no representation about the completeness or accuracy of the data, calculations, information or opinions contained in this report. This report may not be copied, redistributed or reproduced in part or whole without Continuum Economics’s express permission. Information contained in this report or relied upon in its construction may previously have been disclosed under a consulting agreement with one or more clients. The prices of securities referred to in the report may rise or fall and past performance and forecasts should not be treated as a reliable indicator of future performance or results. This report is not directed to you if Continuum Economics is barred from doing so in your jurisdiction. Nor is it an offer or solicitation to buy or sell securities or to enter into any investment transaction or use any investment service.
Analyst Certification
I, Mike Gallagher, the lead analyst certify that the views expressed herein are mine and are clear, fair and not misleading at the time of publication. They have not been influenced by any relationship, either a personal relationship of mine or a relationship of the firm, to any entity described or referred to herein nor to any client of Continuum Economics nor has any inducement been received in relation to those views. I further certify that in the preparation and publication of this report I have at all times followed all relevant Continuum Economics compliance protocols including those reasonably seeking to prevent the receipt or misuse of material non-public information.